Skip to content

Conversation

@ddobrigk
Copy link
Contributor

This PR, coupled with #15010, allows for the possibility of keeping Qmax and Qtot (plus the normalization quantity tpcdEdxNorm) for all global tracks while compressing out the remainder 60-70% of the data volume. This effectively decouples the development of dEdx corrections and the development of ITSTPC tracking studies that have no reason for actually being coupled in terms of resource usage.

@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION RELEASES:
To request your PR to be included in production software, please add the corresponding labels called "async-" to your PR. Add the labels directly (if you have the permissions) or add a comment of the form (note that labels are separated by a ",")

+async-label <label1>, <label2>, !<label3> ...

This will add <label1> and <label2> and removes <label3>.

The following labels are available
async-2023-pbpb-apass4
async-2023-pp-apass4
async-2024-pp-apass1
async-2022-pp-apass7
async-2024-pp-cpass0
async-2024-PbPb-apass1
async-2024-ppRef-apass1
async-2024-PbPb-apass2
async-2023-PbPb-apass5

@ddobrigk ddobrigk marked this pull request as ready for review February 10, 2026 11:48
@ddobrigk ddobrigk requested a review from a team as a code owner February 10, 2026 11:48
Please consider the following formatting changes to AliceO2Group#15045
@ddobrigk
Copy link
Contributor Author

@shahor02 @f3sch note that I made one more change to this PR in which, in case the "keep globals" is enabled for TrackQA saving, also TPC-only tracks that are used by the svertexer (photons) have their TrackQA entries kept. This will allow us to use any improved TPC procedure also for photon analyses. The impact in size is at the per-mille level, since actual TPC-only tracks used by the svertexer are only a few. I've also tested this PR and everything seems to work fine. Please take a look and jump up in case you spot something unexpected or otherwise suspicious. Thanks a lot!

Copy link
Collaborator

@shahor02 shahor02 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

looks good

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants